Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Here's the Story...

When discussing genre theory in class last week for fiction it got me thinking about some stories I wrote years ago that I thought weren’t really good because I didn’t realise the writing styles I was using. When I talked about Intertexuality in one of my posts below (http://book-unfinished.blogspot.com/2010/03/chicken-and-egg-story.html) I pulled out all my old pieces and read them again. Although I laughed a lot at how simple my language was at the time it was really nice to sit back and think how far I have come in my writing! I used to have a lot of problems with writing, yet I loved it so much! The idea, the blank paper, and trying to get them to combine is both challenging but rewarding when the task is done. So when I had to write for an hour in the exercise last week with genre theory I wondered what I could do with my old stories, if I were to re-write it. It’s hard, because the story I did end up using is my baby, I’ve re-written it so many times but I never had the theories and techniques to make it something worthwhile, but I knew the story itself was interesting enough. It has always been floating in my mind somehow, but I never thought to write it again recently. Perhaps I thought deep down that it seemed childish, when I wrote it so long ago. But I pushed the thoughts out and started writing…

When I got home from the class I kept writing, and then I sat on two pages, thinking the same as all of my exercise pieces “that will do, I’ve finished the exercise now.” On the public holiday I let Ben read it, and got an answer I didn’t expect. I was tossing up whether to finish it and submit it to a journal, or even just hand it in for my next assignment, but I didn’t expect his suggestion to turn it into a book!

The world and the characters are so dense, the more I pulled it apart, the more I realised I needed thousands of words to really tell the story. Even when taking it to critique class, I still didn’t have the confidence, I was nervous because I thought they would tear my baby apart. Tell me it’s got potential, but I’ve got so far to go. But even my friends told me it was worth it.

Sometimes all you need is a push from someone. I guess what I’m trying to say, apart from the fact that I am indeed in the process of writing a novel that maybe we think too low of ourselves, and it just takes that one person who cares about you that much (like my Ben!) to tell you its worth something - your time, your energy, and your thoughts. You need people who can be a critique (like a critiquing class!) and to really push you into reality. Tell you “yes, write a novel!”

The best sentence I’ve heard all day!

Now a writer and always yours,

Jinx xx

P.S I'm thinking the picture is a little cheesy, but kind of fits anyway, yes?

Monday, April 19, 2010

Usage and Abusage of Second-hand Bookstores

There are many different reasons why people go into Second-hand Bookstores. For me, a reader, they are an adventure, where hidden gems are waiting to be uncovered when they were neglected some time ago by a precious owner. But as I rummaged through the piles in Brunswick St (careful to not get too excited in front of Ben when I saw Sex and The City novel for only $11.00, yet not so careful when he pointed out ISBN-10’s just to get me excited) I wondered why normal bookstores haven’t gone out of business because of so many Second-hand Bookstores around. But as I looked further I realized that if you aren’t careful, those hidden gems aren’t as polished as you think.

A few examples:
I’m trying to drive myself to read more literary works, particularly those that challenge the way I think, feel and see the world outside my own. I know that many books out there do that, but I think I need a little more boost to my comfortable reading system. So I decided to look for another Helen Garner book. I’m reading The First Stone at the moment but I wanted to get a fiction to change it up a bit. So I found two versions of Monkey Grip and thought “oh jackpot” but realized…one of the copies was $20.00 and not even the correct book. In fact it was a proof, a copy or ‘practise run’ of what the interior of the book might look like. Proofs don’t even have covers, they’re meant to be free things to give to booksellers to market the story before it's released. Perhaps some people might find this a gem, a rare, but obviously special piece…but $20.00 for something that used to be free? That just didn’t seem right to me!

So I kept looking. I then came across a literary reference book I ordered in from my bookstore a while ago but was intrigued as to how they would price this gem. The book is called Usage and Abusage by Eric Partridge, and I ordered the Popular Penguin Classic. I picked up the third edition and was flicking through to see the differences in text when I noticed the pencilled price, $15.00. I immediately shoved it back on the shelf and felt sorry for some people that just don’t do their research. If some poor soul wanted to buy that, without noticing its an older edition and much more expensive than the $9.95 one, then they’d be wasting 5 bucks and maybe only realize AFTER they purchase it what a mistake they made.

But whose fault is this? Who decides the price of a second-hand book? Really, I would love to know! Is it the bookkeepers job and they are just naïve to the fact that its cheaper elsewhere and in Monkey Grip’s case, not the book at all? Or is it part of the adventure to find the deal as well as the story?

When I got home from my fantastic day in Brunswick St I had bought two books. One is Monkey Grip, for $11.00 which I’m thinking (and hoping) is the cheapest I can get without consulting Book Depository. The other, which Ben bought for me (because he’s awesome) is The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch by Philip K. Dick for $22.99 from Brunswick St Bookstore. Yes, an independent bookstore. And I couldn’t be happier with my choice. I figured after searching and enquiring in any second-hand bookstore I visited these holidays (which was A LOT) for ANY Philip K. Dick books, I wasn’t really missing out on a bargain. Though in some cases, bargain can be the wrong word.

When I came to class yesterday for first week back I voiced this to my classmates and one said that it happened to her at one of those Dirt Cheap Books outlets. One that is notorious for cheap books!

Do your research people, if you are as tight with money as me (I’m a student I’m allowed by the way) you would do the ground work before you spend $20.00 on a free book.

On a side note, my five faves of the week (which I haven’t really been doing but feel very in the mood) are:
  • Zucchini Slice
  • Pipsqueak Cider from Little Creatures Brewery in Brunswick St
  • Tuesday nights like tonight when Ben comes over
  • Chewy chocolate chip cookies. Sometimes the simplest cookies are the best!
  • Sex and the City boxed set. I’m still only up to Season 4! But I must watch them before the second movie comes out.

What are your five faves of the week?

Yours,

Jinx xx

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Something To Write On

I needed a quick fix to my writers block. So I logged onto Meet Me At Mikes (my favourite page to visit http://www.meetmeatmikes.blogspot.com/) to get inspired. As always, I was!

For a quick and very helpful writing exercise to stimulate your mind, go to http://www.flickr.com/ THEN type in a year you like. For me it was 1889.

And then let your mind go wild with ideas with the amount of images you can find. For some reason I was staring at this one for a while and can come up with hundreds of stories!
I'm asking so many questions! If it's a wedding photo why is she wearing black? Isn't tradition white? Or was that introduced later? Who are they?
Oh the fun you can have!
Procrastinatingly yours,
Jinx xx

Monday, April 12, 2010

Don't Always Judge a Book by its Cover

Do you judge a book by its cover? Don’t lie! I bet you do! It’s natural, we all do it. And publishers know this. But the publishing industry is becoming more and more involved with the marketing side of things and really wanting us to judge even if it has nothing to do with the book.

Let me explain further.

I was reading Scott Westerfeld’s blog http://scottwesterfeld.com/blog/2010/04/from-russia-with-covers/ (surprise, surprise) and found it quite interesting what his publisher said to him. And I quote from Scott Westerfeld’s page:

Everyone in marketing says that the most important thing a cover can do is sell the book to someone who knows nothing about the novel. In other words, a cover is merely advertising space, and doesn’t need to be true to the text, just eye-catching.

And that is why the third cover release of his Russian Midnighters covers looks like they are about vampires. Observe:

Stupid “creating a new genre” BS

Anyway, so it got me thinking about what I could put on the cover for my journal. Seeing as it’s going to be a different theme every season and therefore a new cover, I would really have to think about what is eye catching, and whether I want to go with the approach of luring my audience in thinking my journal is something it is not.
Which I really feel uncomfortable doing…am I the only person who thinks this is wrong?

Without sounding too biased, I completely agree with Scott Westerfeld. He argued that a cover should connect with the reader AFTER they read the book. The cover should reveal little things about the book, but keep to the idea of what it’s about. For example, symbols that appear in the story, characters and what they look like (not blonde and blue eyed freaks when the character is clearly written to be a red head) which might appear fussy and a bit boring to the publisher, but I believe it will appeal to the audience more.

And being an anal person with my covers (seriously, I paid 15 dollars for a Margaret Atwood book I could easily have gotten for half the price because the cover was my favourite out the lot) I’ve done the leg work. The best covers out there are usually US covers. Sorry Australia! But we’re pussies when it comes to being controversial.
So it’s an overdone example, but we all understand it well so I’m just going to go with it. LIAR by JUSTINE LARBARLESTIER:
When the US first released the cover, there was a white girl on the cover. And the main character is very clearly written as a black African American girl. Shit hit the fan, publishers argued and it slipped through their fingers to the media and told that “people don’t buy books with black people on it”
So, it was exactly what Scott Westerfeld was saying above. Even though it’s not about a white girl, people will pick it up apparently over a black girl on the cover. So it was changed and, oh look, something way cool!
See, US has done it again. It reveals small things about the book in the cover without it being filled with spoilers! See, it’s not that hard to do, so why is it such a hard thing for publishers to do.






Oh and in case everyone forgot, this was Australia’s cover…

So, like, let’s not be controversial and be safe and put nobody on the cover and just have bloody writing. People will like that…and let’s not forget to use the worst colour ever to put on a book jacket, WHITE!
But I shouldn’t bag my country too much, sometimes they do get it right. For example, Nick Caves new release The Death of Bunny Munro. Australia were the only people I have personally found that used an actual person for their front cover. And ok, it was legs spread on a bed, but, ummm isn’t Bunny Munro some kind of womanizer who goes crazy after his wife committed suicide? And not an actual bunny like what every other publishers implied? Just saying…

So, again, I do agree with Scott Westerfeld. Why are we so afraid of covers? Why do we judge so much and why do publishers think they have to lie in order to appeal to our taste? People who read vampire books usually wouldn’t read Midnighters so if you want to keep readers reading and continue to try and get young adults reading, my advice to the publishers is not to deceive us, but to give it to us straight so we know what we are getting into. It’s always nice to know what a books potential can be before turning the pages to find something truly special.

Thoughtfully yours,

Jinx xx